Document Type
Davis v. State of Ohio, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Case No. CV96-312322
Date
1997-05-30
Box Number
43A
Item Number
17
Keywords
discovery, state's filing, limit discovery
Abstract
The State of Ohio’s response to the Estate of Sam Sheppard’s Motion to Limit Discovery. This motion asserts that the State should be given adequate time for discovery. The State harshly accuses the plaintiff’s counsel of confusing the civil matter with the reopening of a criminal investigation. The matters discussed in the motion include the Eberling blood sample, evidence inventoried at the coroner’s office, witness Kathy Collins, Dr. Mohammad Tahir’s DNA testing results, and the FBI Behavioral Science Unit.
Recommended Citation
Jones, Stephanie Tubbs; Marino, Carmen M.; Cassidy, Marilyn B.; and Murphy, Patrick J., "Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Limit Discovery & State of Ohio's Objections to Proposed Pretrial Order" (1997). 1995-2002 Court Filings. 20.
https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/sheppard_court_filings_2000/20
