Document Type
Davis v. State of Ohio, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Case No. CV96-312322
Date
1999-07-28
Box Number
43A
Item Number
33
Keywords
state's filing, discovery, objections, attorney-client privilege, attorney work product
Abstract
The State of Ohio's objection to turning over the depositions of assistant prosecutors David Zimmerman and Carmen Marino. The State claims that these depositions constitute privileged attorney work product.
Overruled as moot pursuant to plaintiff's withdrawal of the motion 9/9/99; see docket
Recommended Citation
Mason, William D. and Cassidy, Marilyn B., "State's Objections to Discovery and Motion for Protective Order" (1999). 1995-2002 Court Filings. 34.
https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/sheppard_court_filings_2000/34
