Title

Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment

Authors

Terry H. Gilbert, Attorney for Sheppard Estate
George H. Carr, Attorney for Sheppard Estate

Document Type

Davis v. State of Ohio, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Case No. CV96-312322

Date

1999-10-13

Box Number

43A

Item Number

44

Keywords

plaintiff's filing, opposition, summary judgment, standing, statute of limitations, laches

Abstract

The State’s motion argued the affirmative defenses of (1) abatement, (2) standing, (3) statute of limitations, and (4) laches. The Estate argues that it is apparent the State is unhappy with the court's rulings on these defenses and wishes to assert them one more time in the hopes that the court will reverse itself. The Estate claims that this repetitive and wasteful litigation should not be rewarded with a favorable decision by the court and that the State's motion should be denied.

The State's Motion for Summary Judgment was denied on 1/24/2000; see docket

Comments

See Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment

Recommended Citation

Gilbert, Terry H. and Carr, George H., "Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment" (1999). 1995-2002 Court Filings. 43.
https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/sheppard_court_filings_2000/43