Title

Motion in Limine to Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed Exhibits (#5, 7, 100)

Authors

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
Marilyn B. Cassidy, Cuyahoga County Assistant Prosecutor
A. Steven Dever, Cuyahoga County Assistant Prosecutor

Document Type

Davis v. State of Ohio, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Case No. CV96-312322

Date

2000-01-04

Box Number

43A

Item Number

86

Keywords

state's filing, motion in limine, exhibits, flashlight, Richard Eberling, Evid.R. 402

Abstract

The State of Ohio seeks to exclude from trial Plaintiff's Exhibits 5, 7 and 100, which include documents relating to Richard Eberling and a police report concerning the discovery of a flashlight. The State argues that these exhibits are not relevant to the determination Sam Sheppard's innocence and should therefore be excluded under Evidence Rule 402. The State also contends that there is no indication that the flashlight was in any way involved in the murder.

See Memorandum Opinion - motion in limine denied.

Comments

See Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion in Limine

Recommended Citation

Mason, William D.; Cassidy, Marilyn B.; and Dever, A. Steven, "Motion in Limine to Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed Exhibits (#5, 7, 100)" (2000). 1995-2002 Court Filings. 77.
https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/sheppard_court_filings_2000/77