Code,800040
Subject,"Paul Moore, Cleveland Hopkins Airport Environmental Planner"
Date,
Interviewer,
Abstract,"Paul Moore, the Airport Enviromental Planner for Cleveland Hopkins Airport, discusses the connection between Airport expantion and Rockefeller Park."
Special Notes,
minutes:,
0,"Doan Brooke, Paul Moore Airport Environmental Planner for Cleveland Hopkins International Airport"
1,Airport expansion
2,"Wetland restoration and preservation, Done Brooke and Rockefeller park the most expensive of the two projects, Obstacles"
3,"People opposed to the project, safety, environmental groups"
4,"Regulatory groups, Ohio EPA, Cultural Garden Federation active participant in Done Brooke water shed study"
5,"Destroying the historic importance of park, concern about the walls that hold the creek, problems with project"
6,"Denise Kucinich, Stephanie Tubes Jones, technical challenges of the project"
7,"Historical bridges, most on a historical register, flow of water"
8,"National Historic Preservation Act, nominating the park for the preservation act"
9,"How will restoration effect the park itself, stream will widen, double the width it is now, 50% of walls removed"
10,"Widening the creek everywhere possible, alleviate the flooding problem, removal of walls"
11,"Narrow walls accelerate water flow, drowning, flood plains"
12,"Trade offs, wall conditions throughout the park, 50% of the walls present are in poor shape"
13,"Planning on removing 50% of walls, benefit of project, eroding of gardens"
14,"New design will help stabilize the gardens, neighborhood involvement in project,"
15,"Council meetings, actively involved with the neighborhood groups"
16,"Neighborhoods extremely important to the development of the project, Shaker Lakes Nature Center"
17,"Opposition to the project, environmental permits"
18,"Resistance from Cultural Gardens Federation, wall problems because of trees"
19,"People want to see project move forward, need to balance everyone's expectations and hopes"
20,"Largest restoration stream project undertaken in Ohio, Urban stream criteria"
21,"Grant money available, environmental benefits, end up with a stream that will end up with less erosion"
22,"Planting native species around Brooke, recreate biology along stream, walls are not the main objective,"
23,"Urban streams, creating a stable environment"
24,"Important project in terms of the urban stream movement, could be used as a model for other projects"
25,"Can be used as a template for other projects around the country, urban stream restoration"
26,
27,
28,
29,
30,
31,
32,
33,
34,
35,
36,
37,
38,
39,
40,
41,
42,
43,
44,
,
45,
46,
47,
48,
49,
50,
51,
52,
53,
54,
55,
56,