Title

Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time in which to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Testimony of David Doughton and Philip Bouffard

Authors

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
Marilyn B. Cassidy, Cuyahoga County Assistant Prosecutor

Document Type

Davis v. State of Ohio, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Case No. CV96-312322

Date

1999-12-14

Box Number

43A

Item Number

57

Keywords

state's filing, extension of time, David Doughton, Philip Bouffard

Abstract

The State of Ohio moves the court for an extension of time to respond to the Estate of Sam Sheppard’s motions to exclude the testimony of David Doughton and Philip Bouffard. The State was unable to locate the affidavit of waiver signed by Richard Eberling.

Comments

See Motion to Exclude Testimony of David Doughton

Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony Pertaining to Handwriting Analysis

Defendant's Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Expert Handwriting Testimony of Dr. Bouffard

State's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Exclude Testimony of David Doughton 1/12/2000

Recommended Citation

Mason, William D. and Cassidy, Marilyn B., "Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time in which to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Testimony of David Doughton and Philip Bouffard" (1999). 1995-2002 Court Filings. 55.
https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/sheppard_court_filings_2000/55