Davis v. State of Ohio, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Case No. CV96-312322
state's filing, opposition, motion in limine, handwriting, Dr. Philip Bouffard, expert witness, Evid.R. 702
The State argues that handwriting analysis is a field of expertise within the Federal Rule of Evidence 702 under the Daubert standard. Accordingly, it concludes that there is no legal basis upon which to exclude the testimony of Dr. Philip Bouffard since the Daubert decision was intended to relax--not restrict--admissibility requirements.
Mason, William D. and Cassidy, Marilyn B., "Defendant's Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Expert Handwriting Testimony of Dr. Bouffard" (2000). 1995-2002 Court Filings. 81.