America's Central Cities and the Location of Work: Can Cities Compete With Their Suburbs?
Journal of the American Planning Association
The 1990s were heralded as a comeback decade for America's central cities, but it is now clear that their experiences varied widely during this purported renaissance. In this article, we first examine the competitive position of central cities in the market for jobs by reviewing the current literature on cities and work. We then analyze correlations between city and suburban job growth rates and reexamine our previous research on cities in the 1990s using data from 1998 to 2001. We draw five practical lessons from this analysis. First, though central cities recent achievements differ, economic distress persists. Second, employment growth in central cities depends on healthy regional employment growth. Third, economic development planning ' must reflect private companies concern for profits. Fourth, economic success requires an educated workforce. Finally, central city governments should practice the habits of growth, without neglecting to plan for the long term. All municipalities, even historically dominant central cities, now have competitors.
Hill, Edward W. and Brennan, John, "America's Central Cities and the Location of Work: Can Cities Compete With Their Suburbs?" (2005). Urban Publications. 0 1 2 3 33.
Hill, E. W., & Brennan, J. (2005). America's Central Cities and the Location of Work. Journal Of The American Planning Association, 71(4), 411-432.
(c) 2005 Taylor & Francis (Routledge)