Volume
66
Abstract
Although the United States Supreme Court has held that public school students maintain freedom of speech and expression in school, courts have continued to restrict these Constitutional rights for these students. The speech protective standard from Tinker has gone from being speech protective to a test that favors and is deferential to school officials embroiled in students’ free-speech controversies. We need to regain the attitude of gratitude for students and their rights.
This abstract was written after publication by 2023-2024 Et Cetera Editor-in-Chief Philip Shipman
Recommended Citation
David L. Hudson, Jr.,
Losing the Spirit of Tinker v. Des Moines and the Urgent Need to Protect Student Speech,
66 Clev. St. L. Rev. Et Cetera
1
(2018)
available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/etcetera/vol66/iss1/2
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Litigation Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons