Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2000
Publication Title
Cleveland Bar Journal
Keywords
professional conduct, ethics, Spaulding v. Zimmerman
Abstract
This discussion poses the question: should an attorney ever provide information to an opposing party to prevent that party from suffering great harm if the information will have an adverse effect on the attorney's own client? The case that sets the stage for this discussion is Spaulding v. Zimmerman, 243 Minn. 346 (1962).
Repository Citation
Lloyd B. Snyder, Ethics, Loyalty and Harm to Third Parties: A Debate Based on Spaulding v. Zimmerman, 72 Cleveland Bar Journal no. 2 at 32 (December 2000)
Volume
72
Issue
2
