Document Type
Davis v. State of Ohio, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Case No. CV96-312322
Date
2000-02-03
Box Number
43A
Item Number
122
Keywords
state's filing, motion in limine, Roger W. Marsters, opposition, expert witness
Abstract
The State of Ohio asserted that it had submitted Dr. Marsters' 1966 trial testimony as Marsters expert report, so Plaintiff had no grounds to request the exclusion of Dr. Marsters' testimony.
See order ruling on this motion.
Recommended Citation
Mason, William D. and Cassidy, Marilyn B., "Defendant's Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Dr. Marsters" (2000). 1995-2002 Court Filings. 108.
https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/sheppard_court_filings_2000/108
