Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-11-1965
Abstract
"ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR
1. The Court erred in not sustaining defendant's Motion to Suppress upon making its finding that the arrest herein was illegal. (R. 96, 100)
2. The Court erred in refusing to apply constitutional guarantees prohibiting illegal searches and seizures and substituting therefor a doctrine of stop and frisk."
Recommended Citation
Stokes, Louis, "65/03/11 Brief of Defendant-Appellant" (1965). Eighth Judicial District of Ohio, Court of Appeals, Cuyahoga County. 2.
https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/terryvohio_cuyahogacountycourtofappealsdocs/2
