Document Type

Article

Publication Date

10-7-2011

Publication Title

Qualitative Research Reports in Communication

Abstract

The currently popular emphasis on democratic discussion in the “public sphere” often is critically viewed by observers commenting on issues of participation, empowerment, and efficacy without input from influentials, whose voices often are the content of public debates. Habermas was critical of the quality of democratic discourse, arguing for an “ideal speech situation” where participants are free to question all proposals; introduce proposals; and express their attitudes, wishes, and needs. This article examines perceptions of the climate of communication in the public sphere by influentials and the general public of a major urban area.

DOI

10.1080/17459435.2011.601526

Version

Postprint

Volume

12

Issue

1

Share

COinS