Abstract
A reader of the January 1968 Symposium on Workmen's Compensation in the Cleveland-Marshall Law Review would be badly misled if he took the titles of the two articles by Messrs. Krise and Keller at face value.' While purportedly about appeals and recommended changes in the Ohio Workmen's Compensation law, these articles are in fact attacks on attorneys who represent claimants in workmen's compensation controversies.
Recommended Citation
Howard Ticktin, Workmen's Compensation Denied: A Reply, 17 Clev.-Marshall L. Rev. 430 (1968)