Abstract
This Note recommends that Congress acknowledge the dangers behind dogfighting by updating the federal mandatory restitution statute to include “animals” within the definition of a “victim” eligible to receive restitution and by updating federal animal-cruelty laws. This recommendation stems from the popularization of dogfighting in the twenty-first century. Specifically, this Note articulates the link between the prevalence of dogfighting in America and the lack of deterrence targeted toward dogfighting in America. This Note then argues that this lack of deterrence is a result of the lack of Congressional guidance within both the federal restitution statute and within federal animal-cruelty laws. By recommending an update to the federal restitution statute and federal animal-cruelty laws, this Note aims to increase these laws’ enforcement power and, ultimately, both deter dogfighting and make it easier for animals who have been harmed in a dogfighting venture to be taken care of and, hopefully, heal.
Recommended Citation
Ayah Ighneim,
Protecting Our Pups at All Costs: Why Dogfighting Cases Require a Mandatory Restitution Assessment,
72 Clev. St. L. Rev.
507
(2024)
available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol72/iss2/9