Abstract
The Supreme Court has often interpreted the Constitution with an eye toward ameliorating failures of the political process. Over the past two decades, however, the Court has retreated from that concern with representation reinforcement. This article examines decisions upholding restrictive voter identification laws, making it more difficult to prove violations of the Voting Rights Act, and preventing federal courts from hearing claims of partisan gerrymandering. Some decisions that seem sympathetic to failures of the political process will not really promote representation reinforcement, and the Court’s most recent cases further reinforce the Court’s skepticism of claims of failures of the political process.
Recommended Citation
Jonathan L. Entin,
The Decline of Representation Reinforcement in the Supreme Court: Increasing Deference to the Political Process,
73 Clev. St. L. Rev.
41
(2024)
available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol73/iss1/10
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Election Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons