Workmen's Compensation - Evidence - Opinion of Non-Treating Psychiatrist Based on Claimant's Statements Held Inadmissible - Candella v. Subsequent Injury Fund

Authors

Kevin F. O'Neill, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State UniversityFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

Fall 1976

Publication Title

University of Baltimore Law Review

Keywords

workers' compensation law, evidence, labor law, employment law

Abstract

Discusses evidentiary requirements in Workers' Compensation cases and circuit court review of Workers' Compensation Commission decisions.

Repository Citation

O'Neill, Kevin F., "Workmen's Compensation - Evidence - Opinion of Non-Treating Psychiatrist Based on Claimant's Statements Held Inadmissible - Candella v. Subsequent Injury Fund" (1976). Law Faculty Articles and Essays. 1016.
https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/fac_articles/1016

Volume

6

Issue

1