Abstract
The National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard (the 'National Standard') was signed into law July 29, 2016. This Article analyzes the National Standard and posits that Vermont’s Act 120 was a more effective labeling law because it safeguarded consumer sovereignty. The State regulatory scheme in place prior to the passage of the National Standard satisfied consumer demand for disclosure while allowing for necessary experimentation with GMO labeling. Part I provides an overview of the current federal scheme regulating GMOs. Part II analyzes of the conflict surrounding GMOs and labeling. Given that analysis, Part III compares the disclosure requirement of the National Standard with the requirements of Vermont’s Act 120 and concludes that Vermont’s labeling law offered a better safeguard for consumer sovereignty because it included a larger range of products and required a label that immediately relayed disclosures to consumers.
Recommended Citation
Jennifer McGee,
Weird Science: Frankenstein Foods and States as Laboratories of Democracy,
30 J.L. & Health
112
(2017)
available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/jlh/vol30/iss1/5
Included in
Agriculture Commons, Agriculture Law Commons, Food and Drug Law Commons, Food Biotechnology Commons, Food Chemistry Commons, Food Processing Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons