Abstract
The use of the locality rule to define or modify the medical standard of care is inconsistent with modern medicine. Nevertheless, various states in the U.S. continue to adhere to a locality rule. This paper revisits this topic, about which I have previously written, by focusing on Idaho, Nebraska, Tennessee and Arkansas. The paper concludes by suggesting that locality rules should be eliminated in favor of a national standard of care.
Recommended Citation
Marc D. Ginsberg,
The Ultra (And Nearly Ultra) Locality Rules Persist! Why Continue to Ignore Modern Medicine and Contort the Standard of Care?,
38 J.L. & Health
196
(2025)
available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/jlh/vol38/iss2/5
Included in
Health Law and Policy Commons, Medical Jurisprudence Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons
