Abstract
This article undertakes to examine, critically, the case history, legislative history, and the construction of sections 101, 201, and 202 of the Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 in an effort to analyze the Supreme Court's recent decision in Lilly v. Medtronics and to discern how the scope of section 271(e)(1) is likely to be treated in future cases in light of that recent Supreme Court decision.
Recommended Citation
Note, The Effect of Lilly v. Medtronics on the Scope of 35 USC 271(e)(1): The Patent Infringement Exemption - Broad or Narrow, 6 J.L. & Health 175 (1991-1992)
COinS