Document Type
Davis v. State of Ohio, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Case No. CV96-312322
Date
1999-12-07
Box Number
43A
Item Number
48
Keywords
plaintiff's filing, David Doughton, motion in limine, Richard Eberling, attorney-client privilege
Abstract
The Estate of Sam Sheppard moves the court to exclude the testimony of David Doughton, the attorney who represented Richard Eberling before Eberling’s death. The Estate argues that the testimony of Eberling’s attorney would violate attorney-client privilege.
(David Doughten did not testify at trial)
Recommended Citation
Gilbert, Terry H. and Carr, George H., "Motion to Exclude Testimony of David Doughton" (1999). 1995-2002 Court Filings. 47.
https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/sheppard_court_filings_2000/47
Comments
See:
Defendant's Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Testimony of David Doughton
State's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Exclude Testimony of David Doughton
Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time in which to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Testimony of David Doughton and Philip Bouffard