Title

Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to State's Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony of Emanuel Tanay

Authors

Terry H. Gilbert, Attorney for Sheppard Estate
George H. Carr, Attorney for Sheppard Estate

Document Type

Davis v. State of Ohio, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Case No. CV96-312322

Date

1999-12-22

Box Number

43A

Item Number

75

Keywords

plaintiff's filing, opposition, motion in limine, expert witness, Emanuel Tanay, Richard Eberling, criminal profiling, Ohio Evid.R. 702, Ohio Evid.R. 403

Abstract

The Estate of Sam Sheppard opposed the State’s motion to exclude the testimony of Emanuel Tanay. Tanay, a forensic psychologist, was to testify that Richard Eberling was Marilyn's killer.

Comments

List of Tanay's credentials and publications attached

See Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony of Emanuel Tanay

See order denying this motion

Recommended Citation

Gilbert, Terry H. and Carr, George H., "Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to State's Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony of Emanuel Tanay" (1999). 1995-2002 Court Filings. 67.
https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/sheppard_court_filings_2000/67