Title

Defendant's Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Testimony of David Doughton

Authors

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
Marilyn B. Cassidy, Cuyahoga County Assistant Prosecutor

Document Type

Davis v. State of Ohio, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Case No. CV96-312322

Date

2000-01-20

Box Number

43A

Item Number

99

Keywords

state's filing, motion in limine, opposition, David Doughton, Richard Eberling, attorney-client privilege

Abstract

The State of Ohio responds to the Estate of Sam Sheppard’s motion to exclude the testimony of David Doughton, who was Richard Eberling’s defense attorney. The grounds for this motion are that Richard Eberling expressly waived attorney-client privilege.

(David Doughton did not testify at trial)

Comments

See Motion to Exclude Testimony of David Doughton

Recommended Citation

Mason, William D. and Cassidy, Marilyn B., "Defendant's Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Testimony of David Doughton" (2000). 1995-2002 Court Filings. 87.
https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/sheppard_court_filings_2000/87