Document Type

Sheppard v. Maxwell, United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Civ. No. 6640

Date

May 2, 1963

Case Title

Sheppard v. Maxwell, S.D. Ohio, Civil Action No. 6640

Box Number

SFC

Item Number

19

Keywords

Memorandum of Petitioner

Abstract

On April 11, 1963 the petition and affidavit in forma pauperis were filed herein by leave of Court. At that time the court ruled that both petitioner and respondent should file their memoranda by April 25, 1963 to shed light on the question of the discretion of the District Court to grant or refuse issuance of the writ upon a reading of the petition. Because respondent's memorandum seems to suggest that Townsend v. Sain, __ U.S. __ , 83 Sup. Ct. 745 and Fay v. Noia, __U.S. __ , 83 Sup. Ct. 822, both decided March 18, 1963, are claimed by petitioner to have changed the law applicable; that by reason of those decisions, this petitioner has rights which did not exist prior to March 18, 1963, leave is asked to present the consideration herein contained by this further memorandum.

Sheppard here asserted that the said two decisions are significant for their instructions to United States District Courts on the mode of procedure in applications for writs of habeas corpus which may come before them.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.