Cleveland's Ecovillage: Green and Affordable Housing Through a Network Alliance
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-2-2011
Publication Title
Housing Policy Debate
Abstract
This article presents a case study of the inter-organizational network that formed to produce four housing projects in Cleveland's EcoVillage designed to integrate social equity and ecological stewardship as the basis for neighborhood redevelopment. Our paper builds on concepts of community development and housing production through inter-organizational networks spanning nonprofit, public, and private organizations that developed and supported four “green” and affordable housing projects. We are interested in understanding how development of the housing projects changed and connected traditional neighborhood development and ecologically-oriented organizations and how their interaction changed the practice of housing production and environmental and sustainability advocacy locally and regionally. The results of the study reveal that the marriage of green and affordable housing in Cleveland, despite some challenges, was viewed as important and beneficial by the organizations involved, and resulted in a range of demonstration projects that not only changed the EcoVillage, but affected other neighborhood housing projects in Cleveland as well. The projects resulted in enhanced capacity for green housing production through creation of a new network of organizations spanning the housing and environmental sustainability fields of practice that continues to support sustainable housing and neighborhood development in Cleveland.
Repository Citation
Kellogg, Wendy A. and Keating, W. Dennis, "Cleveland's Ecovillage: Green and Affordable Housing Through a Network Alliance" (2011). All Maxine Goodman Levin School of Urban Affairs Publications. 0 1 2 3 72.
https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/urban_facpub/72
Original Citation
Kellogg, W. A., & Keating, W. D. (2011). Cleveland's EcoVillage: Green and affordable housing through a network alliance. Housing Policy Debate, 21, 1, 69-91.
Publisher's Statement
© 2011 Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
Volume
21
Issue
1