Greenspace Will Not Always Disproportionately Benefit Disadvantaged Urban Residents
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-2025
Publication Title
Nature Cities
Disciplines
Biology | Environmental Studies
Abstract
Numerous studies report health benefits of visiting or living near greenspaces. Some suggest greater benefits to disadvantaged communities-a hypothesis warranting critical examination. We consider evidence from studies on the interplay of disadvantage and greenspace-health associations, first noting the diversity in definitions of disadvantage. We then note study design and interpretation problems with some of the findings. Further, we argue that more evidence is needed on how (1) greenspace functions as a mediator or effect modifier in the socioeconomic status-health relationship, (2) race, ethnicity and income intersect with greenspace access and use, (3) expansion of greenspace is not always wanted or planned and sometimes accompanies the loss of other amenities in shrinking cities and (4) very disadvantaged communities may realize less benefit from greenspace. Our critical considerations from a public health perspective offer guidance for research that better addresses the realities and needs of disadvantaged communities.
DOI
10.1038/s44284-025-00265-3
Recommended Citation
Pearson, A.L., Reuben, A., Roberts, J.D. et al. Greenspace will not always disproportionately benefit disadvantaged urban residents. Nat Cities 2, 489–495 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-025-00265-3
Volume
2
Issue
6
